We must not be worried about the republican or the democratic status that one person may be or that we may call ourselves, but we must start referencing ourselves as Americans. We must start demanding from those seeking political offices or those  who are currently holding political offices, that our most precious and inspired Constitution will be upheld and restored.  Restored in the manner that our God had intended when he inspired the Founding Fathers of this great nation. By doing so we demand that the 16th, 17th, 14th, 23rd and 12th amendments must be repealed, in order to restore this nation’s greatest form of constitutional republic the world has ever seen. In order to fully secure  our rights, freedoms, and personal liberties that only come from our God and our Creator.

The federal government for years now has increased the tyrannical bond on it’s citizens with the means of taxation without representation, with federal laws and regulations in the name of special interest to line the pockets of certain companies, unions, and politicians with riches that they do not deserve.  Through those means of federal laws, taxation, and regulations it has created bureaucracy beyond our wildest dreams to which the tyrannical bond has also increased on it’s citizens and their lively hood. The federal government has allowed for years now a private bank instead of it’s treasury to issue currency, control our money system and control inflation beyond our wildest dreams, which is tyranny. The federal government has for years now sent our troops to undeclared wars in the name of nation building and democracy for the world.

In closing this is a declaration to our elected officials and those seeking to be elected to certain offices, that we as Americans are demanding our freedoms, liberties, our rights and our prosperity be given back to us,  we the people. We are demanding that our Constitution be upheld and restored once again. We are demanding that the taxation with out representation along with the regulations and the laws be repealed. We are demanding that the entitlements will be scaled back to the point of being repealed, which would allow all men to be free. We demand that our national defense must be secured to protect against invasions. Lastly we demand a sound currency and not one that is printed from some special interest private bank.

God Bless These UNITED STATES of America!

]]> http://jasonthepatriot.info/?feed=rss2&p=792 0 http://jasonthepatriot.info/?p=790 http://jasonthepatriot.info/?p=790#comments Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:07:08 +0000 admin http://jasonthepatriot.info/?p=790 About two years ago I encountered an interesting circumstance at about one o’clock in the morning when I had a knock on my front door from the local police officers patrolling the street that I live on. They had said that this 19 year old kid had confessed to throwing a rock at my car a few different times causing a bit of damage to my car. They had seen him doing cartwheels and somersaults across the street when he decided to run over to my side of the street to do that crime. This kid’s only reasoning to why he had did what he did was that “the spirit made him do it”. It is and was my opinion at that time that the kid had something seriously wrong mentally upstairs. So as the police officials finished up they told me that they were going to prosecute this kid for causing damages over 1200 dollars so that he could be charged with a felony. So after the police had left I got to talking to the kid’s parents to find out that this was his first offense and that he had been struggling for some time now. That he was a good kid with good intentions. So I had made the offer to his father that I would get the quotes of how much it would cost to fix the car, and that he would have the opportunity to make amends and that I would also talk to the prosecutor to reduce the penalty for the crime as long as he got the help that he would need. So that next day I went around town receiving quotes so that I could then call his father totally about 800 dollars, not 1200. Two days later his father drove to my house with the full amount that came from the kid’s savings account to pay for all the damages. Two weeks later the county prosecutor had called me to find out what I would like to see happen, in which case I had said that he had payed me for all of the damages and that my car was fixed. That I would like to see the charges against the kid reduced down to an infraction as long as he receives the care that he needed to get better. As we ended the call I didn’t hear back from this family or the case for nearly two years. When the other day I received a knock on the door, this time it was that same kid completely changed to the point that I could notice his countenance shining. He handed me a great thank you note thanking me of the forgiveness that I showed him those two years ago. He had also said that he was leaving in just a couple months to serve a mission for his  church.

That instance of gratitude from that changed young man was such a blessing on that Wednesday morning when he thank me for my forgiveness,  and I thank god that I was able to experience it. I thank god that he also allowed me to not only be prepared to forgive him that night two years ago, but that I had the opportunity to forgive him that night and change a young man’s life forever for the greater good.  I love my savior lord and king Jesus the Christ he loves all of us. His holy scriptures are true. As we live his gospel life here on this earth is so much more enjoyable. AMEN!

Now thanks to bad legislation over the years we now have a serious issue here in America that we must address and fix the right way. My goal here is to hopefully educate you in the real solution that would fix the immigration problem along with our entitlement problem, and since the Federal government isn’t doing anything to fix the problems my solution is on the level of state governments in the form of nullification. So please if you read this make sure you get involved not just on the national level, but the local level where things will change once there is enough of us to make a real change.

Let’s first talk about E-Verify which if you think about it, could and would morph into a National ID Card. Which would be the biggest encroachment  of the Federal government’s role into every single one of our lives “which is unconstitutional”. But not only that with E-Verify that gives the Federal government  right to know who where and when you are working for any particular employer.  This is bad because of two reasons: one is the same Federal government that has lied to us and invaded our lives would then have full access to our employment information, but two we already have to fight to repeal the 16th amendment which since 1913 has given the Federal government power to see what every one makes at any particular day or what he or see owns due to tax right offs.

Now the wall or fence issue, which is very simple because it only limits a small percentage of immigrants from coming here illegally. Sure in the cases such as Arizona it would help them fight against crime but it doesn’t fix the problem. Another solution that I have heard people talk about is the guest visa programs which will only add to the problems. Let me explain with a couple of common sense answers and a couple of facts that not all people know about. The obvious problem with this solution is the fact that it does not help and actually hurts our 20% plus  unemployment rate nation wide, by not allowing those who are abusing our entitlements from working.  Another reason why work visas is bad, is because of the simple fact that 40% of immigrants over stay their welcome hence another reason why the fence does nothing in fixing the problem. The last reason why work visas are a bad solution to the fix is that of one of my personal experience from what good friends “who are immigrants” told me.  That is when immigrants decide to come up under work visas they not only don’t reinvest the money that they earn back into our country, but they move back to their home countries with currency worth a whole lot more than currency in their own countries and invest in a much nicer lifestyle than when they decided to come into our country. Sure it is a good thing that they improved their lifestyles for their families, but why is that fair to America? When the point of immigration is to come work hard improve your life which in turn improves the quality of life here in America, not some other nation. Now one very bad proposal that has been talked about is amnesty. It was wrong in 1986 as it is today especially today. Why because as a U.S. citizen you have all the  benefits that a U.S. citizen can partake in which includes accessing the unconstitutional entitlement programs. Lets think about this for a second why this notion can not be good. We as a nation is bankrupt because of the entitlements and two there are over 20 million illegals whom are Hispanic not including the other nationalities. So on a fiscal not this would collapse our system of governance.

Now I am sure you are asking what is the solution? Like I said earlier I doubt the federal government is going to do anything to solve this  problem unless it is amnesty. So my ideas must start at a grassroots level with in the independent state legislatures. First is to nullify the federal entitlement laws and programs. Don’t worry any of you that currently need these programs legitimately, because it is currently in most case scenarios being collected at the state level which means it would then be up to the states to spend it based on how they feel need to spend it. Therefore they could then start the cuts where necessary to prevent the waste and any one here illegally from getting it. Next is to nullify the federal immigration enforcement laws, which once again the state would know how to enforce the problem not the feds. Oh by the way on that note I am one that supports the Arizona immigration enforcement law. Lastly we must also nullify the the federal laws to migrate into the country, then that state must adopt a much easier way to except those who want to be here and say no to the ones who do not want to be here.

Immigration supporters crash conservative group’s picnic
Protest » About 30 urge amnesty at caucus gathering.
By Sheena McFarland, The Salt Lake Tribune

http://www.sltrib.com/D=g/ci_15231387

The lengthier article title and story in the Deseret News was not quite accurate both as news and because it failed to be listed as an editorial of the authors emotions on the subject of illegal immigration. However, there were within it some pearls of fact not included in the Trib.

Caucus meeting becomes site of demonstration on immigration reform
Gina Barker, Deseret News

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700037917/Caucus-meeting-becomes-site-of-demonstration-on-immigration-reform.html

I think the two articles were reflective of the event itself. With one significant exception, the PHC people were over thirty years of age and well schooled in the founding documents creating the republic, the biographies of the founders and Patrick Henry, in particular, and the details of the Arizona law that was being protested. The protesting picnic crashers were overwhelmingly less than thirty years old, students at UVU, and well-versed in Progressive-tainted public school distortions of American history, the founders, the legislative intent of the U.S. Constitution and the details, reasons for, and the intent, of the Arizona law they were protesting. Not one in the protest group understood that to oppose the law is to champion rape trees and forced narcotics transport.

The Brown Beret, (I only saw one) and the RSU, UVU division, (is there another?) combined were less than twenty in number. The newspapers cited thirty protesters. Not all of the thirty people standing around the reporters were protesters. I was standing there, for example, I should not have been counted, nor the two others that walked over there with me. Also, not protesting were, at least two news reporters and a TV crew.

Half the battle in advancing one’s point of view is to show up. Tim Bridgewater, Daniel Thatcher, and Carl Wimmer, each a candidate for public office and Cherilyn Eagar, candidate for nomination for Senator, all engaged one on one various members of the protesting group. To their credit, the useful dupes, driven to protest by emotions trumping facts, when presented with facts, stopped chanting and went home. Just a few, maintained a don’t-confuse-me-with-facts-when-I’ve-already-made-up-my-mind posture of trying to shout down with slogans the disturbing rebuttals seeking lodging in their minds.

Two of the RSU persons were exceptional. Zach Olpin, drew me aside so that we could discuss the details of the Arizona law without one of his companions screaming in our ears. The other person, the person de facto, if not in actuality, the leader of the RSU, Gregory Lucero, is a very intelligent, literature based, arm-chair revolutionary. Academia, and myself, likes to entertain the delusion that if the “other” is presented with a few, or a lot of, facts and documents, they will be persuaded to our side of the discussion. Together, Gregory and I, prove the fallacy of that point of view. We seem to have a similar foundation of literature. He, as I, seems to have studied Latin. Mutually, we can claim to have read, Rousseau, Hobbes, Marx, The Federalist Papers, the Constitution, and the Arizona law 1070. Gregory, hold on to your knickers, Conservatives, carries with him a pocket edition of the Constitution! I bet you thought that an act reserved to right-wing nut cases.

As for conclusions drawn from the reading of those documents, we are diametrically opposed. We did unequivocally agree that the U.S. Constitution specifically was opposed to direct democracy. Nevertheless, the discourse was civil and academic to the point of causing an “eyes glazing over moment” for those listening to us debate. ; ^)

Civility, at this point, aside, Gregory, hopefully because he lacks the crucible of history insight and/or the first-hand eye-witness experience, that I have in being at the historical occurrence of minor bloody insurrections in New York City, Chicago ’68, Columbia University’s Days of Rage, and a few others, is a romantic revolutionary of the most dangerous type. He has a disdain for Thomas Paine because Paine rejected Robespierre’s literal heads rolling in the streets form of government. He advocates a day when his opponents will stand before firing squads.(It’s posted on his facebook page.)

I can only hope he gains insight into the genocidal conclusions of his failed, in the crucible of history, political agenda, before he has to experience, and subject the rest of us to, its folly.

As nine pro-Palestinian activists have been killed on a Gaza flotilla, Israel is condemned worldwide for self-defense.

Israel has been defeated in this skirmish by the Palestinians use of several rules of Saul Alinsky’s, “Rules For Radicals”:

pg 127:

(2) Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

(3) Whenever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear and retreat.

Hamas is used to sea-going smuggling. The IDF is not accustomed to having an attempt to pull one of its helicopters out of the sky with a ship.

pg 129: If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it breaks through to the other side to become a positive.

pg. 136: The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.

pg. 96: There ought to be no less than three or four killed so that there will be martyrs, but no more than ten . . .(pg 113) for if losing in a certain action he can get more members than by winning, then victory lies in losing, [so] lose.

Hamas goaded the overwhelming sea and air power of the IDF enough to cause the IDF to give Hamas the exact number of martyrs it desired. By losing this episode, tens of thousands of individuals and the nation of Turkey, Israel’s last, non-Arab, Muslim, ally have switched to the cause of the Palestinians.

That is a very good return on investment of nine martyrs, now enjoying the pleasures bestowed on religious martyrs, in exchange for isolating Israel and goading her to possibly use one of her nukes on Iran, thus making way for the return of the twelfth Imam.

Let me begin the explanation of my position by asking some questions: When did the incumbency problem start with US Senators? When did taxation without representation in the form of Federal Income Taxes begin? The answer to both questions is 1913. And what happened in 1913? During Woodrow Wilson’s presidency, two amendments were added to our Constitution that moved us away from the original intent of the Founding Fathers. Those two amendments were the 16^th, allowing the Congress to “…have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.” and the 17^th, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote…“

Now you are probably thinking that I am right with the 16th Amendment, but you might be thinking I am nuts by calling the 17th Amendment a mistake. The Founding Fathers designed the Federal Government with horizontal checks and balances by dividing the power between three branches – the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. They also provided vertical checks and balances by having the citizenry electing the Representatives for the House and the State Legislatures appointing the two Senators from each State. The Senate was to be the stronger of the two houses of Congress and would safeguard the sovereignty and rights of each State. The 17^th Amendment took vertical power away from the States. Yes, since 1913, the Federal Government has been encroaching on States‘ Rights.

Now let me explain why I believe term limits will not fix the problem. Picture a wall representing the Constitution with cannons on one side representing invaders trying to tear down the wall, and the people of this great land living in freedom with no debt on the other side. Then picture two holes blown through it in 1913 representing these two amendments. Then after years of tax and spend, mountains of debt along with the corruption of the Federal Reserve, chain the free people of America to the chains of tyranny, there comes a carpenter on the “American” side to patch one of the holes with wood not brick, the wood representing the term limits amendment.  Notice which hole is not fixed. You guessed it, it is the 16th amendment hole, which still allows the tax and spend problem, the debt problem, the Federal Reserve problem. Now imagine termites and ants or any other bug coming through the wood. These bugs are representing the special interests that kept the incumbents in power all these years finding a way through the wood to use donations for some other “favorite” candidate to be elected. Limiting terms will not prevent corruption of Senators.

What is the fix then? The fix is this, and it starts today with all the bad bills coming out of Washington. Find out who your state legislators are, and ask them to inform the US Senators how the State expects them to vote on Federal legislation. Follow the voting records of your two US Senators. If their voting record goes against the wishes of the State, then vote them out during the next election. I am including your State legislators in the process due to Article 1, section 3, of the Constitution stating that the US Senators are appointed by each of the State legislatures. State control of the US Senate worked perfectly and made this country a well oiled machine from its formation under the Constitution in 1787 till 1913, and since 1913 we have been slipping down the slippery road of socialism with the exception of great presidents like Calvin Coolidge, Warren Harding, and Ronald Reagan. In my opinion, the real fix is to repeal both the 16th and the 17th amendments. I understand this action might be dangerous right now with the progressives in government because this idea would lead to a Constitutional Convention. Here is a thought: In a Constitutional Convention we could not only repeal the 16th and the 17th amendments, but we would have to have the faith that God would protect his piece of art – this great country and the Constitution.

• She is swearing to continue the work that Judge Stevens did while he served on the bench, when it is Judge Stevens that we are extremely happy to be rid of because of his liberal agenda.
• She got her law degree from Harvard Law School in 1986, but yet she only worked as a clerk for Justice Thurgood Marshall whom was extremely liberal and had noted that our most precious constitution was defected. “these two admired each other”
• Then believe it or not Bill Clinton appointed her to be a judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which was unconstitutional by the way because the Senate never confirmed her or even gave her a hearing to be that Judge.
• The next Job she had was not full time but a visiting professor at Harvard Law School in 1999, then in 2003 she became the dean of  Harvard Law School where she banned army recruiters because of the armies don’t ask don’t tell policy.
• She is not only gay with a partner,  but she has been endorsed by gay activist groups.
• Like other currupted government officials with in this administration that has ties to Goldman Sachs, this lady was working for Goldman Sachs markets institute between 2005-2008 as a member on the Research Advisory Council.

Now lets analyze these facts shall we? The first two are pretty self explanatory why it is not good to have yet another incredible liberal radical judge by looking at the rulings, teachings, and records of both Justice Stevens and Justice Marshall  while on they were on the  bench. The next point is do we really want someone  inexperienced as a lawyer but also lacks the moral principle to except an unconstitutional appointment  when she should of refused the job of appeals court judge.  Do we really want a new supreme court judge who has ties to Goldman Sachs? Do we want a new supreme court judge who wants to pursue gay rights by supporting DOMA and would vote in favor of gay rights when Prop. 8 gets to the supreme court, which would open the door for legalizing gay marriage in this great nation? So I hope this is enough proof to get all of us pissed off enough to call our US Senators and tell them to vote NO  in the nomination of this lesbian for supreme court judge!