My answer to this question is one big fat NO! Now let me go into a  few reasons why I not only think this but know this using some bullet points.

  • She is swearing to continue the work that Judge Stevens did while he served on the bench, when it is Judge Stevens that we are extremely happy to be rid of because of his liberal agenda.
  • She got her law degree from Harvard Law School in 1986, but yet she only worked as a clerk for Justice Thurgood Marshall whom was extremely liberal and had noted that our most precious constitution was defected. “these two admired each other”
  • Then believe it or not Bill Clinton appointed her to be a judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which was unconstitutional by the way because the Senate never confirmed her or even gave her a hearing to be that Judge.
  • The next Job she had was not full time but a visiting professor at Harvard Law School in 1999, then in 2003 she became the dean of  Harvard Law School where she banned army recruiters because of the armies don’t ask don’t tell policy.
  • She is not only gay with a partner,  but she has been endorsed by gay activist groups.
  • Like other currupted government officials with in this administration that has ties to Goldman Sachs, this lady was working for Goldman Sachs markets institute between 2005-2008 as a member on the Research Advisory Council.

Now lets analyze these facts shall we? The first two are pretty self explanatory why it is not good to have yet another incredible liberal radical judge by looking at the rulings, teachings, and records of both Justice Stevens and Justice Marshall  while on they were on the  bench. The next point is do we really want someone  inexperienced as a lawyer but also lacks the moral principle to except an unconstitutional appointment  when she should of refused the job of appeals court judge.  Do we really want a new supreme court judge who has ties to Goldman Sachs? Do we want a new supreme court judge who wants to pursue gay rights by supporting DOMA and would vote in favor of gay rights when Prop. 8 gets to the supreme court, which would open the door for legalizing gay marriage in this great nation? So I hope this is enough proof to get all of us pissed off enough to call our US Senators and tell them to vote NO  in the nomination of this lesbian for supreme court judge!